Clinical Geriatrics - Reviews
Published: 2020-06-15

The secretory senescence of the oro-pharyngo-laryngeal tract

Department of Sensorial Organs, ENT Section, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
Department of Sensorial Organs, ENT Section, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
Department of Sensorial Organs, ENT Section, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
ENT University Unit, ASL Latina, Italy
ENT University Unit, ASL Latina, Italy
ENT Unit of Santo Spirito Hospital, Pescara, Italy
Department of Otorhinolaryngology “Mons. Dimiccoli”, Barletta, Italy
ENT Unit, Policlinico di Bari, Italy
ENT Unit, Policlinico di Bari, Italy
Department of Otorhinolaryngology “Mons. Dimiccoli”, Barletta, Italy
Department of Otorhinolaryngology “Mons. Dimiccoli”, Barletta, Italy
salivary glands oral cavity xerostomia senescence secretory system pharyngo-laryngeal tract immune defence

Abstract

Saliva is an essential body fluid. It is important in maintaining oral health, taste acuity, mastication, deglutition, digestion, regulation of oral flora, oral cleansing, voice acuity, and speech articulation. In the elderly, the glandular parenchyma undergoes involution of the cellular component, and this leads to a reduction in the production of saliva. Qualitative and quantitative alterations of this biological fluid can cause patient discomfort and quality of life decline. This often translates into xerostomia, whose real meaning is mouth dryness. We will discuss here causes of xerostomia in the elderly, such as drugs, head and neck radiotherapy, and autoimmune diseases.

THE ORAL CAVITY AND SALIVARY GLANDS

SALIVARY GLAND PHYSIOLOGY

Salivary secretion is a hypotonic solution composed mainly of water, electrolytes (Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, HCO3-) and organic compounds such as immunoglobulins (IgG, IgM, IgA), proteins, enzymes, mucins, urea, and ammonium. Its pH is between 6 and 7. Ninety percent of saliva is produced by the major salivary glands, while the remaining 10% is secreted by the minor salivary glands situated in the lining of the upper aerodigestive tract. Various systemic diseases, many drugs and oncological therapies can influence the amount of salivary secretion. All these factors can significantly compromise oral health 1.

Physiological basal saliva production in adults ranges from 0.3 to 0.5 ml/min. Secretion upon stimulation can reach values of up to 2 ml/min. Hyposalivation can be defined when basal salivary secretion values are lower than 0.1 ml/min and 0.7 ml/min upon stimulus.

Both afferent and efferent stimuli modulate neural control of salivation. Taste and mastication play a key role in saliva production, however, smell, sight, and the thought of food also contribute. Input to the solitary nucleus from afferent stimuli is integrated via the facial (VII) and glossopharyngeal (IX) nerves. Parasympathetic efferent pathways for the sublingual and submandibular glands are from the facial nerve via the submandibular ganglion and from the glossopharyngeal nerve via the otic ganglion for the parotid gland. Through the liberation of acetylcholine, the parasympathetic nervous system acts upon the muscarinic M3 receptors and produces abundant aqueous saliva. Sympathetic post-ganglionic pathways originate from the cervical ganglion of the sympathetic chain. During stimulation of the sympathetic nervous system, norepinephrine binds the β-adrenergic receptors and causes the production of a thicker and less abundant secretion 2-4. A two-step process characterizes saliva production and secretion 4,5. First, secretion of the isotonic plasma-like primary saliva fluid takes place in acinar cells. A vectorial ion transport develops through ion channels and transporters from the serosal (basolateral) to the luminal (apical) side in the secretory direction. The Cl- transporting proteins expressed on the basolateral membrane accumulate Cl- in amounts greater than its equilibrium potential. Water movement in the salivary glands can follow the transcellular secretion of Cl-. During the second phase, the passage along the duct system modifies the NaCl-rich fluid; actually, most of the NaCl is reabsorbed. The K+ concentration in saliva is higher than in plasma and it is due to KHCO3 secretion. The ductal epithelium is almost waterproof, so the final saliva is usually hypotonic; moreover, NaCl reabsorption is greater than KHCO3 secretion. This biochemical process forms the final saliva, which is composed of water (99%), electrolytes and organic components.

Qualitative and quantitative alterations of this biological fluid can cause patient discomfort and quality of life decline. It is therefore necessary to introduce the concept of xerostomia, meaning mouth dryness.

EPIDEMIOLOGY OF SALIVARY GLAND DYSFUNCTION

It is quite difficult to define the worldwide estimate of xerostomia and salivary gland dysfunction due to methodological differences in study populations and diagnostic criteria. Certainly, this condition arises more frequently in females than in males, and in the elderly compared to young people. The prevalence is probably approximately 30% of the population aged 65 and older. The most frequent cause of xerostomia are drugs, followed by Sjogren’s Syndrome (SS) and head and neck radiotherapy (RT). However, it is not easy to find the true prevalence of xerostomia in the elderly who are under medication. In patients with SS, an autoimmune disease that affects 1-4% of older adult populations, the prevalence of xerostomia is nearly 100%.

Treatment of head and neck cancer causes permanent xerostomia with a 100% prevalence rate. In the United States, approximately 30,000 cases of head and neck cancers were diagnosed in 2000, and the majority of these patients underwent RT causing them permanent salivary gland dysfunction and xerostomia. Estimates of the prevalence of xerostomia in nursing homes and in adult ambulatory populations range 16-72% 6.

CLINICAL FINDINGS OF SALIVARY DYSFUNCTION

As for the physiopathological process, it is possible to say that in the elderly the glandular parenchyma undergoes involution of the cellular component leading to a reduction in the production of saliva. Studies performed on salivary gland specimens have shown that senescence leads to a 30-50% reduction in the number of acinar cells and to the replacement of the parenchyma with adipose tissue. This glandular degeneration begins as early as 35 years of age and continues until 75. The glandular repair process in elderly patients is slower than in young subjects, and this is confirmed by the frequent finding of xerostomia in geriatric patients with a history of radiation therapy 7.

Moreover, elderly people frequently suffer from multiple pathologies which often require polypharmacological therapy. Xerostomia predisposes patients to an alteration of the oral microbial flora with the increase in virulent bacterial and fungal activity. Loss of salivary gland function usually results in the appearance of an increased number of caries forming bacteria (mutans Streptococci and Lactobacillus) in the oral cavity, resulting in “radiation caries” caused by the loss of buffering capacity, lowered salivary pH levels, loss of mechanical flushing, and decreased production of salivary immunoglobulins (i.e., IgA, IgG, IgM), lysozymes, and peroxidases (Fig. 1). Xerostomia may result in mucositis, oral pain or discomfort, and difficulty with articulation, chewing and deglutition; it is also associated with increased dysgeusia, ageusia, soft tissue breakdown, bone loss, and chronic infection. Often patients complain of an oral burning sensation, halitosis and intolerance to spicy foods, all of which can change a person’s lifestyle 8.

In patients with removable dental prostheses, hyposalivation can often cause irritation which results in gingival mucosa damage. Saliva plays an important role in the perception of taste; actually, it is well known how a reduction of salivary flow can influence the ability to discriminate flavours, thus leading to the loss of appetite in the geriatric patient. All these symptoms can lead to changes in food and fluid selection which may compromise nutritional status. One of the main stimuli of saliva production is represented by the food direct activation on the chemoreceptors located at the level of the taste buds. Actually, the diet of the elderly affected by xerostomia consists mainly of soft or semi-liquid foods that do not require an abundant production of saliva for the formation of food bolus. Specifically, a reduced salivary output can disrupt food bolus formation and translocation. This alimentary behaviour causes the loss of taste bud stimulus which results in further reduction of saliva production. Geriatric patients also have a high choking hazard and an increased susceptibility to aspiration pneumonia, with consequent colonization of the lungs with gram-negative anaerobes from the gingival sulcus 9. Extraoral signs include angular cheilitis when lips are dry, broken and frequently colonized with Candida species. After long periods of dehydration and general anaesthesia, older adults sometime develop acute parotitis. Swelling is quite recurrent and the glands may or may not be soft. Old patients sometimes complain about their tongue frequently becoming wrinkled, dry, and they have an increased susceptibility to developing microbial infections, particularly candidiasis 10. Recurrent caries are particularly common in these patients due to retained natural teeth and previously restored dental surfaces. If there is a persistent salivary hypofunction, the salivary system is unable to maintain an adequate oral pH level, and this lack of pH regulation causes the microbial colonization of caries-associated microorganisms and enamel demineralization. Adults wearing dentures are more susceptible to traumatic lesions of desiccated and friable tissues due to the decrease of salivary proteins which provide oral lubrication. Eating and speech difficulties can compromise social relations and may cause some patients to avoid social interactions.

MEDICATION

Medication represents the most common cause of salivary gland disorders. Xerostomia is one of the most frequent side effects of drug therapy. Approximately 80% of commonly used drugs can cause salivary gland dysfunction 11. As the need for medication increases with age, more than 75% of people aged 65 and older take at least one medication, therefore, drug-induced xerostomia is prevalent in the elderly 12. The majority of drugs that cause salivary gland dysfunction have anticholinergic effects on the acinar cells through the inhibition of acetylcholine binding to muscarinic receptors. This blocks the onset of the cascade of physiological phases that, in the end, allows the water to move through the acinar cells into the ductal system, and, finally, into the mouth. A drug that disturbs ion transport pathways may also adversely affect the quality and quantity of salivary flow. Antihistamines, tricyclic antidepressants, sedatives and tranquillizers, antihypertensives (diuretics, alpha and beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors), cytotoxic agents, anti-Parkinsonian and antiseizure drugs may produce these salivary gland disorders 13-17.

Among the most important inhibitors of salivation, antidepressant drugs have strong anticholinergic side effects. Amitriptyline and dothiepin cause more than a 50% reduction in stimulated parotid saliva 18. Chemotherapy may also produce salivary gland disorders during and immediately after the treatment. These effects may be transitory or permanent 19.

HEAD AND NECK RT

Head and neck RT has important and damaging side effects to the oral cavity. Patients often experience mouth dryness, dysgeusia, dysphagia, gingivitis, halitosis, chewing problems, mucositis and traumatic oral lesions 20,21. Experiments show that the serous acini are the most radiosensitive cells due to cell death. More specifically, RT causes two types of damage, apoptosis at low doses and necrosis at high doses, due to the fact that the degenerative process proportionally increases with dose and time 22. Gland parenchyma is characterized by low mitotic activity and cell death is due to deoxyribonucleic acid damage during and shortly after radiation. After a high radiation dose (60 Gy for head and neck cancer) changes become permanent and this causes atrophy of the salivary glands 23.Thresholds of 23-25 Gy have been established. Above these levels, permanent salivary gland destruction occurs, and below them salivary gland recovery can occur after the completion of radiotherapy 24.

SJOGREN’S SYNDROME

SS is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by inflammation of epithelial tissues, especially exocrine glands. SS could be described as having primary and secondary forms. Primary SS involves lacrimal and salivary gland disorders associated with reduction of production of saliva and tears. Secondary SS manifests with other autoimmune diseases such as scleroderma, systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, and, polymyositis. Other epithelial components such as skin and the urogenital, respiratory, and gastrointestinal tracts are commonly involved. Thyroid disease is also common in SS patients. Incidence for primary SS ranges from 0.05 to 4.8% of the population 25. SS may occur at any age, but diagnosis between 35 and 55 years of age is most common. Diagnosis may often be delayed for many years since the onset can be insidious26. The disease occurs in a greater number of females than in males, with a 9:1 ratio.

The pathogenesis of SS remains unknown 27. An environmental agent (e.g., a virus) might trigger events in a susceptible host, resulting in the development of SS.

Since SS is far more frequent in women than in men, hormonal factors, including a relative lack of androgens, may influence pathogenesis 28. A genetic component is also typical in SS. Prevalence of SS and autoantibodies (e.g., anti-Ro/SSA) may be higher in family members of people with SS than in the general population. Primary SS in white patients is often related to the human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR3 and HLA-DQ2 alleles, whereas other alleles are more frequent in African-American and Japanese patients 29. Mononuclear cell infiltrates in exocrine tissues and autoantibodies (particularly anti-Ro/SSA, anti-La/SSB and rheumatoid factor) are a characteristic of SS. The salivary and lacrimal infiltrates of T cells (CD4 helper cells), with fewer B cells, macrophages, and mast cells, could be observed in this disease 30. The hallmarks of SS are ocular and oral symptoms and signs of dryness, a positive labial salivary gland biopsy, and the presence of autoantibodies (anti-Ro/SSA, anti-La/SSB). Insufficient tear production leads to inflammation and lacrimal gland damage. Major salivary gland swelling is frequent in SS due to ductal inflammation, salivary gland hypofunction, and acinar destruction. However, it is important to exclude malignancy in the presence of persistently and significantly enlarged salivary glands and neck lymph nodes. Needle aspiration (for cytological and flow cytometric analyses) associated with diagnostic imaging (e.g., computerized tomographic scans) are helpful in diagnosis. Laboratory tests in SS are frequently positive for anti-Ro/SSA or anti-La/SSB (50-90%), rheumatoid factor (90%) with the presence of hypergammaglobulinemia 30. SS requires management of xerostomia, keratoconjunctivitis, and the syndrome’s autoimmune and inflammatory manifestations. Replacement of damaged salivary gland tissue by artificial salivary glands 31, immunomodulatory therapy 32, and the possibilities for gene therapy are under active investigation. Nowadays, a multidisciplinary approach involving otolaryngologists, ophthalmologists, dentists, rheumatologists, and other medical experts is the best way to manage patients affected by SS.

Other autoimmune diseases that may cause xerostomia will be discussed more in detail in other chapters.

MANAGEMENT OF XEROSTOMIA

Frequent dental check-ups are often considered the first strategy in managing xerostomia due to the occurrence of complications 32,33. Antimicrobial mouth rinses, low-sugar diet, and daily topical fluoride use help prevent caries in patients with insufficient salivary flow, furthermore remaining salivary gland secretions can be stimulated by candies, sugar-free chewing gum and mints. Artificial saliva and lubricants are used in addition to humidifiers for xerostomic symptom relief. Dysphagia is managed with oral moisturizers and lubricants, careful use of fluids during eating, and changes in diet. The Food and Drug Administration approved pilocarpine 34 and cevimeline (two secretagogues) which are capable of increasing secretion and reducing xerostomic discomfort in patients with sufficient exocrine tissue.

Cevimeline should be preferred in therapy since it has a higher affinity for M1 and M3 muscarinic receptor subtypes. M2 and M4 receptors are located on cardiac and lung tissues so they can be used with minimum adverse effects on pulmonary and cardiac function, whereas Pilocarpine is a non-selective muscarinic agonist.

A frequent complication of dry mouth is oral candidiasis, which is commonly treated with topical antifungal agents 35. Ointments, oral rinses, troches and pastilles are effective for most forms of oral candidiasis, and systemic antifungal therapy (e.g., ketoconazole, fluconazole) should be reserved for immunocompromised patients and refractory disease. Dental ill-fitting prosthesis may harbour fungal infections and this can be avoided by its immersion in solutions containing 1% sodium hypochlorite or benzoic acid, 0.12% chlorhexidine.

Substitution of xerostomia-associated drugs with similar types of medications with fewer xerostomic side effects is preferred. Tricyclic antidepressants have been reported to cause more mouth dryness than serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitors 35. Milnacipran, an antidepressive drug and combined noradrenaline-serotonin reuptake inhibitor, provided improved outcomes with less dry mouth symptoms than clomipramine 36. In treatment-resistant schizophrenia, olanzapine showed similar efficacy to chlorpromazine, yet it had 50% less dry mouth side effects 37. These examples and other substitutions can help improve drug-induced xerostomia.

Alternate pharmaceutical regimens may avoid xerostomia 38. If anticholinergic drugs can be taken during the day, xerostomia can be reduced at night since salivary output is lowest at night. Assessment of drug side effects can help reduce the xerostomic potential of many pharmaceuticals used by older people.

There is still no real effective treatment for radiation-induced salivary gland dysfunction 39. As noted, to achieve significant reductions in radiation exposure to glands, three-dimensional treatment planning and dose delivery techniques can be used in order to reduce xerostomia and to improve xerostomia-related quality of life 40. Pilocarpine administration during and after the completion of radiotherapy can improve symptoms of xerostomia 41. Amifostine, a cyto-radioprotectant, may provide cytoprotection against mucositis, nephrotoxicity, myelotoxicity, and xerostomia associated with various radiation and chemotherapy modalities 42,43. These and other emerging strategies may further improve oral health-related quality of life of xerostomic elderly patients.

PHARYNGO-LARYNGEAL TRACT

Senescence is a process involving not only the whole human body but also the secretory system.

In order to understand senescence on the secretory glands of the pharyngo-laryngeal tract, the anatomy and functions of pharynx and larynx must be emphasized.

Although the pharynx mucosa has many caliciform mucosal cells and intraepithelial glands, most of the secretion of the pharyngo-laryngeal tract is produced by sub-mucous glands localized at the level of the larynx, as Gracco pointed out 44.

These are exocrine glands set in a tubular and tubulo-acinus structure. Tubular glands have a mucous secretion. Tubular-acinus glands are characterized by a serum-mucous 45. Both of them are surrounded by myoepithelial cells. They develop at the level of the sub-mucosa, with a specific distribution. In particular, a high concentration in sub-glottic region, in posterior glottic region (Figs. 2-3) and at the level of the supra-glottic region 46 is observed.

In supraglottic region secretory glands are more widespread. In fact, they are not only found at the level of lamina propria and submucosa, but they even reach the area of the ligaments and muscles of this region. Serum secretion is prevalent in supra-glottis. A high glandular concentration is found at the level of false vocal folds and ventricles.

Glandular secretion has the function of lubricating the vocal folds, thus favouring phonation. By moisturizing the vocal cords, secretion guarantees the integrity of the cover. Other important functions are breath humidifying and ensuring the proper function of the muco-ciliary system. Secretion also plays a fundamental role in the mucosal immune defence mechanism, due to the production of immunoglobulins and other components 47,48. In particular, IgA, lactoferrin and lysozyme that are the most important products for immune defence, are released in serum secretion by the tubulo-acinar glands. Therefore, we can conclude that the supraglottic region is mainly involved in this function.

Tomita et al. report how the glandular structures develop from the fourth month of gestation and that they are already complete at the fifth month of gestation 47. During foetal life, at the level of the glandular epithelium, the production of a key protein for the mucosal immune system starts 49-51. However, only in the post-natal period glands play a major role in the production of immunoglobulins 52.

Glandular concentration and distribution in laryngeal tract increase during childhood and achieve their maximum level when larynx completes its anatomical development. Many studies show that the glandular concentration appears constant at the level of the sub-glottic and supra-glottic region up to the average age of 40. Subsequently, in subjects over 40 years old,a progressive reduction of the number of the glands in supra-glottic region is described, while the concentration of glands at the subglottic level is steady 53.

In the elderly the reduction of glandular tissue is also combined with tissue and intracellular changes. Intracellular changes are well documented by a study carried out by Sato et al. 54. A decrease and atrophy of acini with replacement of the glandular cells with adipose tissue is detected. At the intracellular level, there is a reduction of rough endoplasmic reticulum (rER) and Golgi apparatus localized in basal region of the cytoplasm. In the apical zone of the cytoplasm, the secretory granules are reduced. Besides the total reduction of the number of granules, a change in quality can also be seen. In particular, electron-dense granules responsible of secretion of protein component, such as IgA 50, lysozyme and lactoferrin (the main molecule of immune defence) are reduced in favour of electro-bright granules. This shows how, in the elderly, glandular secretion is not only generally reduced, but it assumes completely different characteristics from a qualitative viewpoint: it reduces the production of the protein components (electron-dense granules) resulting in a reduced production of immune elements.

The reduction of the acini and, therefore, the decrease of serum component cause an imbalance in favour of the mucous component of secretion with consequent increase in terms of viscosity. This imbalance causes a negative impact on the muco-ciliary system. In addition, the decrease of protein elements such as immunoglobulins, lactoferrin and lysozyme, and the deficiency of the muco-ciliary system, expose the elderly to a greater vulnerability to external agents.

These qualitative and quantitative changes in glandular secretions play a key role in the functional senescence of the organ. At the laryngeal tract, in fact, secretion that is fundamental for the lubrication of mucosa also plays an important role for phonation.

Ichikawa 55 performed photodynamic studies on a group of patients in order to evaluate the effects of the quantity and quality of mucus on the voice, concluding that viscosity of secretions has an impact on phonation. The Author assumes that morpho-functional changes in laryngeal salivary glands result in a quantitative reduction in secretions leading to a change in laryngeal viscosity and lubrication. This, along with the senile morphological variations of the vocal folds, is the basis of the vocal aging 56. Moreover, the secretory modifications will lead the elderly to complain about dysphonia and pharyngo-laryngeal dryness in absence of organic laryngeal pathologies.

As it was already pointed out, another aspect playing an important role in the “organ aging” is the immunosenescence. It is known that laryngeal secretions contain immunoglobulins (mainly IgA, but also IgG and IgE) and antibacterial factors such as lactoferrin and lysozyme.

As we already mentioned, these components are secreted by the serous acicular glands and contain intracellular electron-dense granules. In the elderly, there is a reduction in the number of serum cells, which is particularly significant in the supra-glottic region. On one side, a reduction in electro-dense granules is observed and, on the other side, an increase in electro-lucent granules is also observed, which have different chemical and biological characteristics.

A qualitative and quantitative alteration of the granules leads to a reduction in the local immunity of the organ. Another fundamental defence mechanism in the upper airways is the muco-ciliary transport, which is regulated by three factors: eyelashes, mucus and their interaction. Increased viscosity of the mucus reduces the effectiveness of this system 45. These two combined factors contribute to the reduction of organ defence mechanisms and an increase in the inflammatory and infectious phenomena of VADS.

In conclusion, we can say that secretory senescence in pharyngo-laryngeal tract is not only due to a decrease in number of exocrine glands, particularly in supra-glottic region, but also to an equally important alteration in quality. Reduction of serum protein secretion corresponds to an increase of mucus component which results in a decline of immune defence, higher viscosity and, consequently, a reduced efficacy of muco-ciliary system.

Figures and tables

Figure 1.Xerostomia and clinical consequences.

Figure 2.Salivary glands distribution in larinx.

Figure 3.Salivary glands of larynx (posterior glottic region) [H&E, original magnification 40x].

References

  1. Dawes C, Pedersen AM, Villa A. The functions of human saliva: a review sponsored by the World Workshop on Oral Medicine VI. Arch Oral Biol. 2015; 60:863-74. DOI
  2. Miranda-Rius J, Brunet-Llobet L, Lahor-Soler E. Salivary secretory disorders, inducing drugs, and clinical management. Int J Med Sci. 2015; 12:811-24. DOI
  3. Melvin JE, Yule D, Shuttleworth T. Regulation of fluid and electrolyte secretion in salivary gland acinar cells. Ann Rev Physiol. 2005; 67:445-69. DOI
  4. Hall JE. Textbook of medical physiology. Saunders Elsevier: Philadelphia; 2011.
  5. Catalán MA, Nakamoto T, Melvin JE. The salivary gland fluid secretion mechanism. J Med Invest. 2009; 56:S192-6. DOI
  6. Ship JA, Pillemer SR, Baum BJ. Xerostomia and the geriatric patient. J Am Geriatric Soc. 2002; 50:535-43. DOI
  7. Gil-Montoya JA, Silvestre FJ, Barrios R. Treatment of xerostomia and hyposalivation in the elderly: a systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016; 21:e355-66. DOI
  8. Atkinson JC, Wu A. Salivary gland dysfunction: causes, symptoms, treatment. J Am Dent Assoc. 1994; 125:409-16. DOI
  9. Gibson G, Barrett E. The role of salivary function on oropharyngeal colonization. Spec Care Dent. 1992; 12:153-6. DOI
  10. Terpenning M, Bretz W, Lopatin D. Bacterial colonization of saliva and plaque in the elderly. Clin Infect Dis. 1993; 16:S314-6. DOI
  11. Smith RG, Burtner AP. Oral side-effects of the most frequently prescribed drugs. Spec Care Dent. 1994; 14:96-102. DOI
  12. Narhi TO. Prevalence of subjective feelings of dry mouth in the elderly. J Dent Res. 1994; 73:20-5. DOI
  13. Nederfors T, Twetman S, Dahlof C. Effects of the thiazide diuretic bendroflumethiazide on salivary flow rate and composition. Scan J Dent Res. 1989; 97:520-7. DOI
  14. Nederfors T, Dahlof C, Ericsson T. Effects of the antihypertensive drug captopril on human salivary secretion rate and composition. Eur J Oral Sci. 1995; 103:351-4. DOI
  15. Streckfus CF, Wu AJ, Ship JA. Stimulated parotid gland salivary flow rates in normotensive, hypertensive, and hydrochlorothiazide-medicated African Americans. J Oral Path Med. 1994; 23:280-3. DOI
  16. Nederfors T. Xerostomia: prevalence and pharmacotherapy. With special reference to beta-adrenoceptor antagonists. Swed Dent J(Suppl). 1996; 116:1-70.
  17. Bergdahl M, Bergdahl J. Low unstimulated salivary flow and subjective oral dryness: Association with medication, anxiety, depression, and stress. J Dent Res. 2000; 79:1652-8. DOI
  18. Hunter KD, Wilson WS. The effects of antidepressant drugs on salivary flow and content of sodium and potassium ions in human parotid saliva. Arch Oral Biol. 1995; 40:983-9. DOI
  19. Harrison T, Bigler L, Tucci M. Salivary sIgA concentrations and stimulated whole saliva flow rates among women undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer: an exploratory study. Spec Care Dent. 1998; 18:109-12. DOI
  20. Valdez IH, Atkinson JC, Ship JA. Major salivary gland function in patients with radiation-induced xerostomia: flow rates and sialochemistry. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys. 1993; 25:41-7. DOI
  21. Henson BS, Eisbruch A, D’Hondt E. Two-year longitudinal study of parotid salivary flow rates in head and neck cancer patients receiving unilateral neck parotid-sparing radiotherapy treatment. Oral Oncol. 1999; 35:234-41. DOI
  22. Stephens LC, King GK, Peters LJ. Unique radiosensitivity of serous cells in rhesus monkey submandibular glands. Am J Pathol. 1986; 124:479-87.
  23. Eisbruch A, Ten-Haken RK, Kim HM. Dose, volume, and function relationships in parotid salivary glands following conformal and intensity modulated irradiation of head and neck cancer. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys. 1999; 45:577-87. DOI
  24. Greenspan D. Oral complications of cancer therapies. Management of salivary dysfunction. NCI Monographs. 1990; 9:159-61.
  25. Pillemer SR, Matteson EL, Jacobsson LT. Incidence of physician-diagnosed primary Sjogren syndrome in residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota. Mayo Clin Proc. 2001; 76:593-9. DOI
  26. Anaya JM, Talal N. Sjogren’s syndrome comes of age. Semin Arthritis Rheumatol. 1999; 28:355-9. DOI
  27. Fox RI, Maruyama T. Pathogenesis and treatment of Sjogren’s syndrome. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 1997; 9:393-9. DOI
  28. Sullivan DA. Sex hormones and Sjogren’s syndrome. J Rheumatol. 1997; 24:17-32.
  29. Fox RI, Tornwall J, Maruyama T. Evolving concepts of diagnosis, pathogenesis, and therapy of Sjogren’s syndrome. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 1998; 10:446-56. DOI
  30. Anaya JM, Talal N. Sjogren’s syndrome comes of age. Semin Arthritis Rheumatol. 1999; 28:355-9. DOI
  31. Baum BJ, Wang S, Cukierman E. Re-engineering the functions of a terminally differentiated epithelial cell in vivo. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1999; 875:294-300. DOI
  32. Fox PC. Management of dry mouth. Dent Clin North Am. 1997; 41:863-76. DOI
  33. Yamano S, Baum BJ. Prospects for gene-based immunopharmacology in salivary glands. Jap J Pharmacol. 2000; 82:281-6.
  34. Vivino FB, Al-Hashimi I, Khan Z. Pilocarpine tablets for the treatment of dry mouth and dry eye symptoms in patients with Sjogren syndrome: a randomized, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose, multicenter trial. P92-01 Study Group. Arch Intern Med. 1999; 159:174-81. DOI
  35. Shay K, Truhlar MR, Renner RP. Oropharyngeal candidosis in the older patient. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997; 45:863-70. DOI
  36. Trindade E, Menon D, Topfer LA. Adverse effects associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants: a metaanalysis. Can Med Assoc J. 1998; 159:1245-52.
  37. Leinonen E, Lepola U, Koponen H. Long-term efficacy and safety of milnacipran compared to clomipramine in patients with major depression. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1997; 96:497-504. DOI
  38. Conley RR, Tamminga CA, Bartko JJ. Olanzapine compared with chlorpromazine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 1998; 155:914-20. DOI
  39. Sreebny LM, Schwartz SS. A reference guide to drugs and dry mouth-2nd edition. Gerodontology. 1997; 14:33-47. DOI
  40. Greenspan D. Oral complications of cancer therapies. Management of salivary dysfunction. NCI Monographs. 1990; 9:159-61.
  41. Eisbruch A, Dawson LA, Kim HM. Conformal and intensity modulated irradiation of head and neck cancer: the potential for improved target irradiation, salivary gland function, and quality of life. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 1999; 53:271-5.
  42. Zimmerman RP, Mark RJ, Tran LM. Concomitant pilocarpine during head and neck irradiation is associated with decreased posttreatment xerostomia. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys. 1997; 37:571-5. DOI
  43. Capizzi RL, Oster W. Chemoprotective and radioprotective effects of amifostine: an update of clinical trials. Int J Hematol. 2000; 72:425-35.
  44. Gracco C, Kahane JC. Age-related changes in the vestibular folds of the human larynx: a histomorphometric study. Journal of Voice. 1989.
  45. Kutta H, Steven P, Kohla G. The human false vocal folds – an analysis of antimicrobial defense mechanisms. Anat Embryol (Berl). 2002; 205:315-23. DOI
  46. Ganly I, Patel SG, Coleman M. Malignant minor salivary gland tumors of the larynx. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006; 132:767-70. DOI
  47. Nakashima T, Makishima K, Komiyama S. Local immune system in the developing fetal larynx. Laryngoscope. 1980; 91:398-407. DOI
  48. Nakashima T, Komiyama S, Makishima K. Immunopathological study of the larynx. IgA distribution and secretory activity. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1980; 89:359-65. DOI
  49. Tomasi TB, Jan EM, Solomon A. Characteristics of an immune system common to certain external secretions. J Exp Med. 1965; 121:101-24. DOI
  50. Brandtzaeg P. Mucosal and glandular distribution of immunoglobulin components. Differential localization of free and bound SC in secretory epithelial cells. J Immunol. 1974; 112:1553-9.
  51. Mogi G, Watanabe N, Maeda S. Laryngeal secretions. An immunological and immunohistological study. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh). 1979; 87:129-41. DOI
  52. Nakashima T, Umeno H, Yonekawa S. Growth of laryngeal glands in I infants: a comparative study of the sub- and supraglottic larynx. J Laryngol Otol. 2002; 116:14-8. DOI
  53. Tomita H, Nakashima T, Maeda A. Age related changes in the distribution of laryngeal glands in the human adult larynx. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2006; 33:289-94. DOI
  54. Sato K, Hirano M. Age-related changes in the human laryngeal glands. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1998; 107:525-9.
  55. Ichikawa T. Basic studies on the lubrication of the larynx during phonation. Jibi to Rinsho. 1982; 28:38-52. DOI
  56. Davids T, Klein AM, Johns MM. Current dysphonia trends in patients over the age of 65: is vocal atrophy becoming more prevalent?. Laryngoscope. 2012; 122:332-5. DOI

Affiliations

Andrea Gallo

Department of Sensorial Organs, ENT Section, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy

Veronica Clemenzi

Department of Sensorial Organs, ENT Section, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy

Andrea Stolfa

Department of Sensorial Organs, ENT Section, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy

Giulio Pagliuca

ENT University Unit, ASL Latina, Italy

Ferdinando Maria Nobili Benedetti

ENT University Unit, ASL Latina, Italy

Claudio Caporale

ENT Unit of Santo Spirito Hospital, Pescara, Italy

Alessandro Maselli del Giudice

Department of Otorhinolaryngology “Mons. Dimiccoli”, Barletta, Italy

Teresa Maino

ENT Unit, Policlinico di Bari, Italy

Valentina de Robertis

ENT Unit, Policlinico di Bari, Italy

Francesco Cariti

Department of Otorhinolaryngology “Mons. Dimiccoli”, Barletta, Italy

Francesco Barbara

Department of Otorhinolaryngology “Mons. Dimiccoli”, Barletta, Italy

Copyright

© Società Italiana di Gerontologia e Geriatria (SIGG) , 2020

How to Cite

[1]
Gallo, A., Clemenzi, V., Stolfa, A., Pagliuca, G., Nobili Benedetti, F.M., Caporale, C., Maselli del Giudice, A., Maino, T., de Robertis, V., Cariti, F. and Barbara, F. 2020. The secretory senescence of the oro-pharyngo-laryngeal tract. JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS. 68, 02 Special (Jun. 2020), 69-76. DOI:https://doi.org/10.36150/2499-6564-483.
  • Abstract viewed - 610 times
  • PDF downloaded - 72 times